In Re Opinion 668 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
In Opinion 668, 132 N.J.L.J. 573 (1992), the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics (ACPE) addressed whether the rationale of State v. CIBA-GEIGY Corp., 247 N.J.Super. 314, 589 A.2d 180 (App.Div.), appeal granted, 126 N.J. 338, 598 A.2d 895 (1991), appeal dismissed, 130 N.J. 585, 617 A.2d 1213 (1992), which dealt with ethical restraints on ex parte interviews of current employees of a corporate litigant, applied with equal force to the conduct of ex parte interviews of former employees of a corporate litigant. In its analysis of the issue, the ACPE did not undertake its own review of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. SanchezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Tonique Griffin v. City of East Orange (074937)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- Andrews v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Camden v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Klier v. Sordoni Skanska Const. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Essex County Jail Annex Inmates v. TreffingerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.