Legal Opinion
Tonique Griffin v. City of East Orange (074937)
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 22, 2016No. A-32-14PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Patterson
This appeal arises from a judgment in favor of the defendant employer in a sexual harassment case. We review the Appellate Division’s determination affirming the trial court’s decision to bar the testimony of a fact witness.
Plaintiffs Tonique Griffin (Griffin), Virginia Best (Best) and Rosalyn Walker (Walker), employees of the City of East Orange (City), alleged that they were sexually harassed by a supervisor. In the wake of plaintiffs’ internal reports of the alleged harassment, the City retained an attorney to conduct an investigation of their claims. Corletta Hicks (Hicks), an aide to the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kerry Ellison v. Nicholas F. Brady, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- State v. MarreroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
- E & H Steel Corp. v. PSEG Fossil, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. T.D. (In re M.G.)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- State of New Jersey v. James J. MautiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- ABIR ELGHANDOUR VS. MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, ETC. (L-5963-14, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.