Legal Opinion

Davis v. State Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1855PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR to the Tippecanoe Probate Court.

1Per curiam

In this case an interest in land of an infant was sold, at private sale, without appraisement. The proceeding was under the code of 1843. It was erroneous; but after it was had, the legislature passed an act legalizing it, and confirming the sale. Local Laws 1846, p. 137.

Under the old constitution, the legislature could pass special acts relative to infant’s estates. Doe v. Douglass, 8 Blackf. 10. And while Andrews v. Russell, 7 id. 474, remains the law of this Court, the statute above cited can not be set aside; and, consequently, the judgment of the Court below in this case, confirming the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Watson v. MercerSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  2. Doe ex dem. Chandler v. DouglassIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maynes v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Walpole v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Board of Commissioners v. BrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Burget v. MerrittIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Henderson v. State ex rel. MoonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API