Legal Opinion

Doe ex dem. Chandler v. Douglass

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1846PublishedCited by 19 opinions

ERROR to the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Ejectment for the undivided third part of three lots in the town of Evansville, brought by Doe, on the demise of William H, John J., and Mary R. Chandler, against John Douglass. Verdict for the defendant; motion for a new trial overruled; and judgment on the verdict.

Both parties claim title under Asaph Chandler; the lessors of the plaintiff as heirs at law, and the defendant through a purchase, from Asaph's administrator.

*11The authority by virtue of which the administrator made the sale, was an act of the legislature, approved January 1st, . 1819, the preamble to which recites, that it was…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Cochran v. Van SurlayNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  3. Rice v. ParkmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Borman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  2. Lafayette, Muncie, & Bloomington Rail Road v. GeigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Hedderich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Shoultz v. McPheetersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Beebe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API