Legal Opinion

Burget v. Merritt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1900No. 18,816PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Erom the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C. J.

— In 1882 William Burget died intestate, seized of 160 acres. He left surviving him Harriet Burget, who was his second wife and by whom he had no children, *144and appellants, who are descendants from a former marriage. In 1883 appellants executed to Seager a deed of release and quitclaim for the fee simple title to the whole tract. They sold and intended to convey to Seager the complete title except a life estate of the widow in an undivided third. Seager paid appellants $6,200, which was the full value of all the land, and he believed that he was acquiring title to the whole except a life…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Satterlee v. MatthewsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Watson v. MercerSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  4. Inhabitants of Goshen v. Inhabitants of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
  5. Haskett v. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kelley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. McPherson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Clarke v. DarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Swank v. TyndallIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Garrison v. DayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API