Wickes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ELLETT, 'Justice:
The plaintiff and her husband were the named insureds in an automobile insurance policy which contained a provision that if a named insured should be killed while occupying an automobile, the defendant would pay to the beneficiary the sum of $10,000. Plaintiff’s husband lost his life while occupying an automobile, and this' action was commenced to recover on the policy. Summary judgment was granted to the defendant, -and the plaintiff appeals.
The policy of insurance was for a period of six months with a provision for renewal of an additional six months if a premium was paid…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- McClure v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Barnett v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersUtah Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States Fire Insurance Company, Etc. v. Producciones Padosa, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Andrade-Sorto v. Allstate Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009