Legal Opinion

Wickes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1972No. 12598PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, 'Justice:

The plaintiff and her husband were the named insureds in an automobile insurance policy which contained a provision that if a named insured should be killed while occupying an automobile, the defendant would pay to the beneficiary the sum of $10,000. Plaintiff’s husband lost his life while occupying an automobile, and this' action was commenced to recover on the policy. Summary judgment was granted to the defendant, -and the plaintiff appeals.

The policy of insurance was for a period of six months with a provision for renewal of an additional six months if a premium was paid…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. McClure v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Barnett v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersUtah Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Fire Insurance Company, Etc. v. Producciones Padosa, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  2. Andrade-Sorto v. Allstate Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API