Corey v. Avco-Lycoming Division

I agree with the second ground of decision — that there is not sufficient evidence to support the conclusion of the Commission on Human Eights and Opportunities — and believe the disposition of this case should be made solely on that ground.

Preliminarily, I must question whether the majority opinion’s authority for holding that parties are bound by the decision of an official administrative agency of the government is authority for holding them bound in all respects by an arbitrator’s award, in view of the dictum of Waterbury Savings Bank v. Danaher, 128 Conn. 78, 92, 20 A.2d 455, and the…