Legal Opinion

Kline v. Doughboy Recreational Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 2, 1993No. C0-92-702PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

This case arises out of injuries caused when respondent Lucinda Kline dove into her above-ground swimming pool in 1984. Respondents filed suit against appellant in 1987 claiming the injuries occurred because the pool was defective in design and unsafe for its intended use.

*437Denying appellant’s summary judgment motion, the trial court ruled as a matter of law that the swimming pool was not a permanent improvement to real property and respondents’ claims were not barred by a two-year statute of limitations. The case proceeded to trial which resulted in a jury verdict for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rose v. Fox Pool Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Nelson v. Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Integrity Floorcovering, Inc. v. Broan-Nu Tone LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
  4. Lewis v. Hopewell Valley Racquet ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  5. Merritt v. MendelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API