Forty Mill Realty Venture v. State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Department
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PUDLOWSKI, Judge.
This case involves appellants’ action for inverse condemnation. The trial court sustained respondent’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. On appeal, appellants argue: 1) although no property was taken, respondent’s reorganization of certain highways damaged appellants’ property and this violates Article 1, § 26 of the Missouri Constitution; and 2) their equal protection rights have been violated.
Appellants’ petition contains the following allegations. Appellants are the fee simple owners of a tract of land upon which a leased shopping center is located.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. MeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. GaleenerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Kansas City v. Berkshire Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Jim Lynch Toyota, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ressel v. Scott CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Scott Family Props., LP v. Mo. Highways & Transp. Comm'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Scott Family Properties, LP v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2016