Legal Opinion

Forty Mill Realty Venture v. State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Department

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1994No. 63692PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Judge.

This case involves appellants’ action for inverse condemnation. The trial court sustained respondent’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. On appeal, appellants argue: 1) although no property was taken, respondent’s reorganization of certain highways damaged appellants’ property and this violates Article 1, § 26 of the Missouri Constitution; and 2) their equal protection rights have been violated.

Appellants’ petition contains the following allegations. Appellants are the fee simple owners of a tract of land upon which a leased shopping center is located.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. MeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. GaleenerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. Kansas City v. Berkshire Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Jim Lynch Toyota, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ressel v. Scott CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Scott Family Props., LP v. Mo. Highways & Transp. Comm'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Scott Family Properties, LP v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API