Legal Opinion

Schupp v. Grill

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 12, 1992No. 10216PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.

The plaintiff, David A. Schupp, administrator of the estate of David A. Schupp, Jr., appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant. On appeal, he claims that the trial court improperly instructed the jury on the evaluation of expert testimony and on the responsibilities of a pedestrian on a roadway. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

*514The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. On February 25, 1988, the plaintiffs decedent was jogging on Floydville Road, a two lane highway that runs east and west in East Granby. Each travel lane is fourteen feet wide, with an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Matthews v. FMC CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. State v. DysonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sandow v. EcksteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Espinosa v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2004
  3. Wager v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API