Schupp v. Grill
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The plaintiff, David A. Schupp, administrator of the estate of David A. Schupp, Jr., appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant. On appeal, he claims that the trial court improperly instructed the jury on the evaluation of expert testimony and on the responsibilities of a pedestrian on a roadway. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
*514The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. On February 25, 1988, the plaintiffs decedent was jogging on Floydville Road, a two lane highway that runs east and west in East Granby. Each travel lane is fourteen feet wide, with an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Matthews v. FMC CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. DysonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sandow v. EcksteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Espinosa v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2004
- Wager v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019