Legal Opinion
United States v. Dan Kendall
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 5, 2007No. 06-3044PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYE, Circuit Judge.
Dan Kendall appeals his eighty-four month sentence arguing 1) the district court 1 exceeded the scope of this court’s remand, 2) the sentence is unreasonable, and 3) this court should reconsider its holding in United States v. McCall, 439 F.3d 967 (8th Cir.2006) (en banc) (holding a felony conviction for Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) may be a crime of violence). 2 We affirm.
I
Kendall pleaded guilty to knowingly possessing equipment, chemicals, products, and materials used to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(a)(6). He was originally sentenced to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Darrin Todd HaackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Timothy Jerome McCallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Douglas Greg CorneliusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Delaney Poor BearCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Ned WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. KilgoreWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. WileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. PepperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.