Legal Opinion

United States v. Ned Walker

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 6, 2005No. 04-1815PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, District Judge.

The issue in this case is whether Iowa’s offense of Operating While Intoxicated (“OWI”) is a “crime of violence” under the United States Sentencing Guidelines.

I

Ned Walker entered a plea of guilty to a charge of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. The presentence investigation report stated that his base offense level was 24, which should be reduced three levels for acceptance of responsibility, leaving an offense level of 21. Walker had a total of 17 criminal history points, placing him in criminal history category VI, which would make Walker’s sentencing range 77…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Crane v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Timothy Jerome McCallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. GiggeyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Larry BegayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Gregory Anthony Rendon-DuarteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Dan KendallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API