Goss v. Broom
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Lochren, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The defendant authorized the plaintiff, as his agent, to sell a tract of land, for which he was to receive a stipulated compensation. This action is for the recovery of that compensation. A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant seeks a new trial on the ground that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence. The terms of sale prescribed by the defendant to the plaintiff were that the price should be eight thousand dollars; “three thousand dollars cash, and a first mortgage, payable on or before three years, for the balance of purchase-money,” ($5,000.) On the 18th day of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hart v. HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
3Cited by21 opinions
- McFarland v. LillardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Greer v. KooikerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Buckingham v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Colburn v. SeymourSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- Grosse v. CooleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.