Rawson's Case
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtPattangall, J.
Workmen’s Compensation case. On appeal from decree awarding compensation.
Petitioner was an office employee of respondent. It was his duty, during the noon hour, to go to the Post Office for his employer’s mail and after examining same to telephone such orders as required immediate attention. After doing this, he ate lunch at his own home and, later, returned to his work, bringing the mail with him to the office.
In proceeding from his place of work to the Post Office, and in walking from the Post Office to his home, he travelled a different route *564than that directly used in going from his place…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Whitney v. Hazard Lead WorksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Paulauskis' CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
- Eby v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Littlefield's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Oliver v. Wyandotte Ind. CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Oliver v. Wyandotte Industries CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Babine v. Lane Construction CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
- Abshire v. City of RocklandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Pillen v. Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.