Menefield v. Foreman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, J.
Inmate James Fredrick Menefield appeals the denial of his writ of mandate, which sought to compel appeals coordinators at Pleasant Valley State Prison (PVSP) to complete the processing of an inmate appeal submitted by Menefield. His appeal had been cancelled during the screening process on the ground it was duplicative of an earlier appeal.
Menefield contends the appeals coordinators’ duty to process the appeal was ministerial and, because his August 2, 2012, appeal was not duplicative of his June 6, 2012, appeal, they had no discretion to cancel it.
We conclude that appeals…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- REA Enterprises v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n v. Valley Racing Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Villery v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Smith v. Ogbuehi, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Cape Concord Homeowners Assn. v. City of EscondidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Gomez v. MaddenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Lecour v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.