Legal Opinion

Ponderosa Properties, LLC v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 23, 2014No. T71380; A150764PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevore, J.

Petitioner Ponderosa Properties, LLC, seeks judicial review after an administrative law judge (AL J) upheld a notice of tax assessment that the Employment Department (department) issued to petitioner. The ALJ determined that 21 individuals who performed work for petitioner as cleaners and maintenance workers were employees of petitioner and that petitioner had failed to pay unemployment taxes on their wages. Petitioner contends that the individuals were independent contractors, as defined by ORS 670.600(2), whose compensation was not subject to unemployment taxation. For the reasons explained…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. S-W Floor Cover Shop v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Schaff v. Ray's Land & Sea Food Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. McDowell v. Employment DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Freeman v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Pam's Carpet Service, Inc. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Professional House Cleaning by Mary G, LLC v. Sonia Medina LopezDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  2. Value Linx Services v. Linx Card Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API