Legal Opinion
Sea Lar Trading Co. v. Michael
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 14, 1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin Evans, J.
Petitioner, in this article 78 proceeding, seeks judgment declaring sections D46-15.0 and D46-17.0 of the Adminis*94trative Code of the City of New York unconstitutional; annulling certain warrants, restraining notices and notices of sale, in that they are claimed to take property without due process of law; annulling a notice of postseizure hearing as beyond the authority and power of the respondent; and seeks other related relief including a hearing to determine the truth of the basic facts on which the actions of the respondent were predicated.
Petitioner is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips, Inc. v. New York State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by4 opinions
- Apollo Technologies Corp. v. Centrosphere Industrial Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Sea Lar Trading Co. v. MichaelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Lincoln First Commercial Corp. v. New York State Tax CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1987
- Res Bro, Inc. v. MichaelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984