United States v. Wilkerson
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
HARRY S. MATTICE, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is the Government's Motion for Notification of an Advice of Counsel Defense. [Doc. 134]. For the reasons stated more fully herein, the Government's motion will be DENIED .
I. BACKGROUND
In this criminal action, the Government alleges that Defendants conspired and aided and abetted each other in committing health care fraud ( 18 U.S.C. § 1347 ); committing wire and mail fraud ( 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343 ); paying or receiving "illegal remunerations" (also colloquially known as "kickbacks" or "bribes") ( 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b)(2)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cooper v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Jacob v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023