Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Lyall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J.:

While from the record before us we are convinced (and the special guardian concedes) that the trustees acted in good faith and for what they regarded to be the best interests of the estate in all these transactions, we are agreed that the investment^ made by the trustees in the securities enumerated under the heading “ Sales of reinvestments of proceeds of sale of Brighton Mills stock ” in Schedule A, section 2, of the account, and those enumerated in Schedule C of the account, are unauthorized either by law or by the will of the testator, and likewise, that the formation of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of RyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  2. In re MaitlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Furniss v. ZimmermanNew York Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Junkersfeld v. Bank of Manhattan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. In re the Accounting of TonerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  3. In re the Accounting of KirbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. In re the Estate of PoillonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API