Legal Opinion

Junkersfeld v. Bank of Manhattan Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 16, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.

The complaint alleges the following:

Plaintiff and Westchester Title and Trust Company (hereinafter referred to as Westchester Trust) on May 12, 1930, qualified as coexecutors of the estate of Peter Junkersfeld, deceased. At the time of his death the decedent owed to two banks the sum of $32,500, which indebtedness was secured by certain certificates of stock as collateral. To pay off these loans the executors borrowed $32,500 from Westchester Trust against their promissory note, satisfied the decedent’s loans with the proceeds and pledged with Westchester Trust the stock thereby released.

On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. Union Stock Yards & Transit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. American Ass'n v. InnisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. Langdon v. TempletonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1893
  4. Ansley v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Account of Proceedings of Westchester Title & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. LockwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Palumbo v. PalumboNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. In re the Estate of PoillonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  4. M & T Mortgage Corp. v. FoyNew York Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Stone v. FreemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API