Legal Opinion
Furniss v. Zimmerman
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Cross motions for final judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
■ Guy, J.
Cross motions for final judgment upon the report of a referee appointed to take and state an ac*139count and report with opinion. These were two motions by contingent remaindermen for a judicial settlement of the accounts of two trusts under the will of William P. Furniss, deceased, for the benefit of his two daughters, Miss Clementina Furniss and Mrs. Margaret E. Zimmerman. Decedent died in 1871, and there has been no judicial settlement of the accounts of either trust since December, 1874. De'cedent left six children, three sons and three daughters, of whom his daughters Miss Furniss…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of NilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Woodbridge v. . BockesNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Butterfield v. . CowingNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of RyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Meier v. Union Trust Co., Exr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of LyallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Davis v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938