Legal Opinion

Krohn v. Forsting

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided July 17, 1998No. 4:97-cv-00413PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

11 F.Supp.2d 1082 (1998)

Marsha KROHN, Plaintiff,

v.

Jack W. FORSTING, et al., Defendants.

No. 4:97-CV-413 CAS.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division.

July 17, 1998.

Rick Barry, Rick Barry Law Office, Clayton, MO, for Plaintiff.

Elbert A. Walton, Jr., St. Louis, MO, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHAW, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendants Jack W. Forsting and the City of Berkeley, Missouri's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and amended motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff opposes the motions.

Plaintiff Marsha Krohn brings…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cruz-Packer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. Washington v. ConleyNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Citizens Opposing Industrial Livestock v. Jefferson County Board of AdjustmentNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Dillon v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  5. Marez v. SAINT-GOBAIN CONTAINERS, INC.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API