State v. Windham
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNYN, Justice.
We decide in this condemnation action involving a partial taking whether the trial court erred by excluding evidence offered by the condemnor, controverting that offered by the landowner and admitted by the court, regarding the appropriate economic unit to be considered by the jury for determining the market value of the part taken. We hold that the trial court reversibly erred by excluding such evidence. Because the court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s erroneous exclusion of the con-demnor’s evidence, 803 S.W.2d 340, we reverse the judgment of the court of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- City of Pearland v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Exxon Pipeline Co. v. ZwahrTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon GardinerTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
- VanDevender v. WoodsTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- In re StateTexas Supreme Court · 2011
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.