Legal Opinion

In re State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 2011No. 10-0235PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson

After the State sought to condemn a tract of land, the owners subdivided the property into eight separate parcels. The trial court then severed the case into eight different proceedings. The State contends that the severance was improper, and it seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the trial court to vacate the order. Because the severance would require eight trials where only one is appropriate, and because it would preclude the State from presenting relevant valuation evidence, we conditionally grant the writ.

I. Background

The State of Texas filed a petition to condemn a tract of land and a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re Team Rocket, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. F.F.P. Operating Partners, L.P. v. DuenezTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In Re Masonite Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon GardinerTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  2. In re FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  3. Randy L. Yeske v. Piazza Del Arte, Inc., Swiss International, Inc., D/B/A Swiss Builders, Tino Bekardi, David E. Kassab and Paul GarnneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. in Re Mike East, Alice East, Lisa East and Alejandro Urias, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014
  5. in Re Texas Education Agency and Michael L. Williams, Commissioner Of Education for the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2014

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API