Brandon & Dreyer v. Conner
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Judge Nottingham. City court of Macon. December 27, 1902.
1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.
Brandon & Dreyer brought an action, in the city court of Macon, upon two promissory notes, against F. B. Dunn & Conner, as a firm composed of F. B. Dunn and B. F. Conner. Conner pleaded the general issue, non est factum, and specially that “he was not and never had been a member of the firm of F. B. Dunn & Conner; that he had never held himself put as a member of said firm; that he had never incurred any liabilities under said firm name, or authorized any one else to incur liability under said firm name.” The case was tried without a jury by the city-court judge, who rendered a judgment, in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sankey & Shorter v. Columbus Iron WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Thornton v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Perry v. Butt & BanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Buckner v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
- Padgett v. FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Dawson National Bank v. Ward & GurrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Butler v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Hall & Ham v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Jahn v. Lamb (In Re Lamb)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.