Legal Opinion

Jahn v. Lamb (In Re Lamb)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided December 23, 1983No. Bankruptcy No. 1-81-02256, Adv. No. 1-82-0424PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RALPH H. KELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge.

Despite the caption of this bankruptcy case, the main question is whether Charles Lamb and Gary Lamb were partners in the business known as Rubenstein’s. The bankruptcy petition commenced a case only for the alleged partnership and not for Gary Lamb and Charles Lamb as individuals.

The partnership’s case was converted from a chapter 11 reorganization to a chapter 7 liquidation. Under chapter 7, the trustee in bankruptcy may recover from the general partners’ individual assets any deficiency of the partnership’s assets to meet its liabilities. 11…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Wyatt v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  3. Watson v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Dills v. Delira Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Wymer v. DedmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Estate of Labrum & Doak v. Bechtle (In Re Labrum & Doak, LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. McGraw v. Betz (In Re Bell & Beckwith)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990
  3. Miller v. Spitz (In Re CS Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. In Re LambUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1984
  5. Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Murphy (In Re Selheimer & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API