John T. Derwin v. State Employees Retirement Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
This case requires us to determine whether the decision of an administrative agency after reconsideration is appealable under the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA)1 even though the agency decision prior to reconsideration was itself not final for purposes of appeal. The plaintiff, John T. Derwin, sought certain additional retirement benefits from the defendant, the state employees retirement commission (commission), under General Statutes §§ 5-173 and 5-192b.2 The commission denied the plain*413tiff’s request and, after granting the plaintiff’s application for reconsideration, affirmed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Fleming v. GarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Glastonbury Volunteer Ambulance Ass'n v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Truelove & MacLean, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Doe v. MarselleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Sweetman v. State Elections Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Paige v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Shew v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.