Legal Opinion

Grobart v. Grobart

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 31, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The sole inquiry here, as stated by defendant-appellant, is whether the alimony awarded to complainant-respondent in this suit for separate maintenance is, in amount, "unwarranted and oppressive and not in accordance with appellant's ability to pay."

The master reported that testimony adduced before him disclosed that the capital interest of appellant in real estate inherited from his deceased father, subject to the widow's dower, was in excess of $38,000, and that his proportionate share of the income from the estate was approximately $6,500 per annum; that his individual interest in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Freeman v. FreemanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1891
  2. Walling v. WallingNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1863

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Adams v. AdamsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  3. Boyce v. BoyceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  4. Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API