Legal Opinion
Kyne v. Kyne
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 6, 1945No. Civ. 12811PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
By a judgment affirmed by this court
(Kyne v. Kyne, 38 Cal.App.2d 122 [100 P.2d 806]) defendant Tom Kyne was ordered to pay a monthly sum for the support of plaintiff, Tom Kyne, Jr., found by a jury to be Tom Kyne’s illegitimate son. The present proceeding is a motion in the original action to increase the monthly support allowance from $60 to $250, and for attorneys’ fees. The trial court denied the application for an increase, and awarded plaintiff’s attorneys for their services on the motion the sum of $150. Plaintiff appeals from both portions of the order, contending that the trial court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Makzoume v. MakzoumeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Busch v. BuschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Brockmiller v. BrockmillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- De La Luz Tovar Cozzi v. CozziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Straub v. StraubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Wong v. Wong Hing YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.