Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Boyce

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 30, 1940Published

1Opinion of the Court

Grosman, A. M.

This is an application by the complainant, under R. S. 2:29-46 for an order to strike out the answer filed by the defendant Harrison H. Boyce to the complainant’s first cause *144of action, as amended, on the ground that said answer is frivolous and fails to disclose a sufficient defense. The only objection offered to the motion is a challenge to the jurisdiction of this court over the subject-matter of the suit.

The defendant Harrison H. Boyce was originally represented in this litigation by Messrs. Proctor & Nary, of Asbury Park’. After process was served upon said defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lidgerwood Estates v. Public Service, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. Polhemus v. Holland Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  3. Falaenau v. Reliance Steel Foundry Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
  4. Gasteiger v. GasteigerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  5. Baum v. CanterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API