Legal Opinion
Wanland v. Law Offices of Mastagni, Holstedt & Chiurazzi
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 6, 2006No. C048390PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HULL, J.
In an earlier appeal, we affirmed a judgment of dismissal following an order granting defendants’ special motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP (anti-strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16; further undesignated section references are to the Code of Civil Procedure). We also awarded defendants costs and attorney fees on appeal, with the amount to be determined by the trial court.
On remand, the trial court entered an order for costs and attorney fees that included expenses incurred both for the appeal and for a challenge to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Dove Audio, Inc. v. Rosenfeld, Meyer & SusmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Evans v. UnkowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Paul for Council v. HanyeczCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Graham-Sult v. ClainosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- 569 East County Boulevard LLC v. Backcountry Against the Dump, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Graffiti Protective Coatings, Inc. v. City of Pico RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Lucky United Properties Investment, Inc. v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- D.C. v. R.R.California Court of Appeal · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.