Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1983No. 82-1103PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

Appellant asks us to find both that the appellate court erred in upholding the trial court’s bar of his action for failure to comply with the requirements of R.C. 2723.01 et seq., and that R.C. 319.36 and R.C. Chapter 2721 are the controlling statutes in the instant action. Appellees request that should this court find R.C. 319.36 applicable to the case at bar that we also appoint a special master commissioner to assist in determining the import of *365the subject tax records. As we reject appellant’s claims of the relevancy of R.C. 319.36, the matter of the appointment is moot.

Neither party to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Malloy v. City of WestlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State ex rel. Foreman v. Bellefontaine Municipal CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Swetland Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. City of Cuyahoga Falls v. BeckOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State Ex Rel. Bassichis v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. City of Urbana ex rel. Newlin v. DowningOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Jean Best v. Brianna BestWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Jenkins v. EberhartOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Musial Offices, Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Deluca v. City of AuroraOhio Court of Appeals · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API