Legal Opinion

Seaman v. Rindge, Kalmbach, Logie & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1917No. Docket No. 108PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Kent; McDonald, J. Assumpsit by Rudolph Seaman and another, as assignees of Elmer P. Forbes, against Rindge, Kalmbach, Logie & Company, Limited, for breach of contract. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plantiffs brought this action as assignees of Elmer P. Forbes to recover damages for an alleged breach of a contract by defendant to insure for Forbes as well as itself his stock of merchandise at Chippewa Lake, Mich., upon whicji defendant held a chattel mortgage and policy of insurance as trustee for certain creditors. Plaintiffs, who are relatives of Forbes, were not witnesses in the case, and apparently had no personal knowledge of the transactions involved. Their declaration alleges, and it is not denied, that Forbes assigned to them “all his right, title, and *419interest in and to said…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harrington-Wiard Co. v. Blomstrom Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Wierengo v. American Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hintz v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Brant v. GallupIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Sauer v. McClintic-Marshall Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bentley v. FayasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Warrener v. Federal Land Bank of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  3. Mais v. Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API