Legal Opinion
Botwinick v. Ogden
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 15, 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Milonas, J.
Plaintiffs-appellants commenced an action against Conde Nast Publications, Inc. (Conde Nast), Dr. Herbert Ogden, and others for personal injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff Sylvia Botwinick as a result of medical malpractice which occurred during the time she worked for Conde Nast. In September of 1977, Conde Nast offered its employees, including Botwinick, the opportunity to have chest X rays taken and reviewed as part of a general physical examination program available at the company. Botwinick thereupon underwent the X-ray procedure in *294September of 1977…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Garcia v. IsersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Golini v. NachtigallNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Claim of Allen v. American AirlinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by6 opinions
- Unger v. Continental Assurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Firestein v. Kingsbrook Jewish Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Ruiz v. Chase Manhattan BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Linzee v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 1983
- Ruiz v. Chase Manhattan BankCivil Court of the City of New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.