Legal Opinion
Weaver v. University of Cincinnati
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 31, 1991No. C-1-90-591PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARL B. RUBIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon cross-motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs Carol Weaver et ah, and by defendants Joseph L. Steger and Jill Parris (the “University Defendants”) and District 925/SEIU (“District 925”). 1 (Doc. Nos. 32, 34, 38, 40, 41, 42). Pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court does hereby set forth its Findings of Fact, Opinion, and Conclusions of Law.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The plaintiffs are, or have been, employees of the University of Cincinnati at all times relevant hereto.
2. Defendant Joseph L.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- James Tierney v. City of Toledo, Toledo Police Patrolman's AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Alan P. Damiano (Certified Class Members) v. George G. Matish, International Union, Uaw, and Local 6000, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wessel v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Weaver v. University of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Laramie v. County of Santa ClaraDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992
- Weaver v. The University Of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Bromley v. MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION-NEADistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.