Legal Opinion

People v. Berardini

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided January 30, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKoenig, J.

Two indictments were filed by the grand jury against each of the above-named defendants charging them with a violation of section 305 of the Penal Law, which reads as follows: “ Any officer, director, trustee, employee or agent of any corporation to which the banking law is applicable, who abstracts or wilfully misapplies any of the money, funds or property of such corporation or wilfully misapplies its credit, is guilty of a felony.”

*313Indictment No. 195,570, in brief, alleges that these defendants, being directors of a moneyed corporation, M. Berardini State Bank, did willfully misapply the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Boughton v. . FlintNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. People v. RoperNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. People v. . SwerskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. People v. MarcusNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Syracuse v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. MiroNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API