Legal Opinion
City of Syracuse v. Murray
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 19, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorehouse, J.
The plaintiff, the City of Syracuse, a municipal corporation, the holder of tax sale certificates as evidence of sales of the real property hereinafter described, for nonpayment of taxes assessed and levied by it for the years 1929, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935 and 1936, as well as for certain local assessments, has brought this action under article 7-B of the Tax Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 60), and prays for judgment to the effect that it thereby has a good and valid title to the premises paramount to the claims of any of the defendants or persons claiming under them.
The premises, as described in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dunkum v. MacEck Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- County Securities, Inc. v. SeacordNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- McCoun v. . PierpontNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Blum v. Nassau Purchasing & Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Herlands v. SurplessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Griffin v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1942
- People ex rel. Upstate Telephone Corp. v. EatonNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- Municipal Lien Corp. v. GawronskiNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Chornoma v. FieldNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1980