Legal Opinion
Collazo v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 1972PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArnold L. Fein, J.
In this action to recover for personal injuries sustained by an infant aged five and one-half, brought by his father as guardian, and by the father individually for loss of services and moneys expended on behalf of the infant, defendants, relying on Dole and its progeny, move to amend their answer to assert a counterclaim against the plaintiff father for negligence in failing adequately to supervise and control the infant plaintiff, whose injuries were allegedly sustained when he was struck by a bus owned and operated by defendants. (Dole v. Dow Chem. Co., 30 N Y 2d 143; Kelly v. Long Is.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Birkett v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Mangam v. . Brooklyn R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Camardo v. New York State RailwaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Verni v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Sorrentino v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hairston v. BroadwaterNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Lastowski v. Norge Coin-O-Matic, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Fake v. Terminal Hardware, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1973
- Kiernan v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Searles v. DardaniNew York Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.