Legal Opinion
Searles v. Dardani
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 8, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold J. Hughes, J.
In this action by an infant for personal injuries and by his father for loss of services and medical expenses, defendant has moved for leave to serve an amended answer asserting a counterclaim against the father based on his alleged failure to supervise the infant and seeking an apportionment of defendant’s liability to the infant, if any, pursuant to Dole v. Dow Chem. Co. (30 N Y 2d 143).
The complaint alleges that defendant negligently operated her automobile upon a public highway abutting the plaintiffs’ residence as to strike and injure the infant pedestrian. The proposed amended answer…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mangam v. . Brooklyn R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Camardo v. New York State RailwaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Verni v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Sorrentino v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972
- Marrero v. Just Cab Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lastowski v. Norge Coin-O-Matic, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Favier v. WinickNew York Supreme Court · 1992
- Republic Insurance v. MichelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Graney v. GraneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973