Legal Opinion

Kiernan v. Jones

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard F. McCaperey, J.

The plaintiff moves for an order to strike the counterclaim which was interposed under the authority of Dole v. Dow Chem. Co. (30 N Y 2d 143).

The father herein is acting as a plaintiff in the dual role, first that of guardian ad litem of his infant daughter, and also in his individual capacity in the derivative action for any expenses and loss of services.

The infant, Mary Elizabeth Kiernan, was six years of age when she was involved in an accident on August 20, 1972 with defendant’s car while she was riding a bicycle on Benken Boulevard in Franklin Square, New York, which was and still is a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Condon v. Associated Hospital ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Cannon v. CannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Sorrentino v. SorrentinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Sorrentino v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  5. Marrero v. Just Cab Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Young v. DalidowiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Hairston v. BroadwaterNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Lastowski v. Norge Coin-O-Matic, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  4. Searles v. DardaniNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Ryan v. FaheyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API