Legal Opinion

Mercer v. South Dakota Attorney General Office

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 2015No. 27215PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERN, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Pro se appellant Robert M. Mercer appeals from the circuit court’s order affirming the administrative agency’s decision denying him access to Richard Ben-da’s death investigation records under SDCL 1-27-1.5(5). Mercer asserts that the public’s significant and legitimate interest warrants access despite SDCL 1-27-1.5(5). Because the language of this statute prohibits disclosure, we.affirm.

BACKGROUND

[¶2.] On November 26, 2013, Robert M. Mercer submitted a request to the South Dakota Attorney General’s Office under SDCL 1-27-37 for the release of the Division of Criminal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. National Archives & Records Administration v. FavishSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Kostel v. SchwartzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Zoss v. United Building Centers, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Argus Leader Media v. HogstadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Argus Leader Media v. HogstadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Danielson v. HuetherDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
  4. In Re the Sales Tax Liability of USA Tire Management Systems, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Wipf v. AltstielSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API