Climate Control, Inc. v. Hill

STRUCKMEYER, Chief Justice.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted to correct a possible erroneous impression left by a statement in this court’s opinion issued July 15, 1959. Since we feel that it was necessary to grant a rehearing, we will also briefly discuss certain other aspects of appellant’s motion.

We said in the statement of. facts concerning the trial court’s ruling in Cause No. 6414,

“As to the corporate defendants, three of appellant’s claims were dismissed and a part of the fourth.”

This is incorrect. The corporate defendants were dismissed entirely from the fourth claim for…