Stuart v. Norviel
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Superior Judge.
— Cave Creek is a small stream of water in Cochise county from which the appellant and appellees had, prior to June 7, 1920, appropriated and put to beneficial use water for agricultural purposes. On June 7, 1920, eleven of the water users of Cave Creek, pursuant to chapter 164, Session Laws of 1919, known as the Water Code, filed a petition with the state water *495commissioner requesting the determination of the relative rights of the users to the waters of Cave Creek.
The petition of the users was based upon section 16 of chapter 164 of the act of the legislature.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pacific Live Stock Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Farm Investment Co. v. CarpenterWyoming Supreme Court · 1900
- In re Willow CreekOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Enterprise Irrigation District v. Tri-State Land Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912
- Vineyard Land & Stock Co. v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ElkoNevada Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- O'Hair v. O'HairArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Department of Public Works v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Oren v. Swift CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Climate Control, Inc. v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.