Legal Opinion
Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Rotocast Plastics Products, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 11, 1977No. 75-1495PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAVERFIELD, Judge.
By way of this interlocutory appeal, defendants seek re.view of an order denying their motions to dismiss in this action for usury, breach of contract and fraud.
The instant litigation arises out of an agreement for an accounts receivable financing loan between plaintiff Rotocast Products, Inc. and one of the defendants Exchange National Bank of Chicago. The loan was guaranteed by the individual plaintiffs Robert and Carolyn Grossman. An eight count complaint seeking compensatory and punitive damages was filed against Exchange Bank, Lincolnshire Financial Services, Inc.,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Northside Iron and Metal Company, Inc. v. Dobson and Johnson, Inc., and the Third National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- National Bank of North America v. Associates of Obstetrics & Female Surgery, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. RockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
3Cited by8 opinions
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. BougasSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. BANCO DELDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Mac Organization, Inc. v. Harry Rich Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- FIRST PENNSYLVANIA BANK, NA v. OreckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Landmark Bank of West Broward v. GirouxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.