Legal Opinion

FIRST PENNSYLVANIA BANK, NA v. Oreck

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 10, 1978No. 77-2446PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

357 So.2d 743 (1978)

FIRST PENNSYLVANIA BANK, N.A., Appellant,

v.

Robert P. ORECK, Appellee.

No. 77-2446.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 10, 1978.

Robert J. Pleus, Jr., and Edward A. Marod of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Michael G. Williamson, of Johnson, Motsinger, Trismen & Sharp, Orlando, for appellee.

MOORE, Judge.

This is a timely interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellant's motion to dismiss for improper venue. Appellant contends that venue is controlled by 12 U.S.C.A. § 94 and that it can be sued only in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Buffum v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  4. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. BougasSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Harry Bechtel and Cathleen Bechtel, Husband and Wife v. Liberty National Bank, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BMC Industries, Inc. v. Barth Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. BMC Industries v. Barth IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Opinion No. (1991), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API