Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Veliz
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
Petitioner brings this special action to challenge an order of the respondent forcing it to answer various interrogatories and to produce a file and lease agreements. Discovery matters are properly entertained in special actions, City of Phoenix v. Peterson, 11 Ariz.App. 136, 462 P.2d 829 (1969) and since we believe the respondent abused his discretion in ordering discovery beyond permissible bounds, we choose to take jurisdiction and grant relief.
The subject litigation arises out of an automobile-train collision at the West Simpson Street crossing on May 9, 1971.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dean v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Phoenix v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Industrial Commission v. HolohanArizona Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by4 opinions
- O'Hearn v. Hillcrest Gym & Fitness Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Ingalls v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Miller v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- FRED MILLER M.D., Et Ux. v. LUZ BARRERA, MUTUAL INSURANCE COCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006