Mooty v. Butler
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for malicious prosecution; from city court of LaGrange — h. L. Meadors, judge pro hac vice. September 24, 1919.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
'1. Under the provisions of the act approved August 21, 1911 (Park’s Code, § 6090 (a)), no question as to the filing of the brief of evidence can be entertained by the reviewing court, where the judge has finally passed on the merits of the motion for a new trial, unless the question was first raised and insisted on before the trial judge. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co. v. McElmurray, 12 Ga. App. 441 (78 S. E. 258) ; Collins v. State, 12 Ga. App. 655 (77 S. E. 1079) ; Chicago & Northwestern Railway v. Elliott, 16 Ga. App. 388 (85 S. E. 615). A bona fide effort to brief the evidence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. HandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. McElmurray Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Lazar v. Black & White Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935