Legal Opinion

Lazar v. Black & White Cab Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1935No. 24059PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. The motion to dismiss the writ of error is overruled. It can not be held that there was no bona fide effort to brief the evidence as required by the Civil Code (1910), § 6083 (Code of 1933, § 70-305). Peek v. Irwin, 164 Ga. 450 (139 S. E. 27); Blackburn v. Lee, 137 Ga. 265 (73 S. E. 1) ; Mooty v. Butler, 25 Ga. App. 121 (102 S. E. 842).

*5682. Among other requirements for the admission in evidence of depositions, it must appear that they were properly transmitted to the court where the legal proceeding in which they were taken was pending. Findlay v. Mineralized Rubber Co., 98 Ga. 275 (25 S. E.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eddleman v. AskewCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Russell v. BayneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Howard v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  4. Blackburn v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Shrouder v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Freeman v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Pollard v. GormanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Randall Bros. v. DuckettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Brooks v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Brooks v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API