Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Resnik v. Curtis & Davis, Architects & Planners, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 24, 1978No. 13890PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Slater
The State sued several architects and contractors for breach of contract. The trial court dismissed the amended complaint for two reasons: First, the State was not the proper party plaintiff; second, the defendant, Curtis & Davis, Architects and Planners, Inc. (C&D Inc.), was not a party to the contract.
Plaintiff appeals from that order dismissing its claims against fewer than all of the parties, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 304 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 110A, par. 304).
On April 26, 1966, the Illinois Building Authority (IBA) entered into a contract with Curtis & Davis Partnership (C&D…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carson Pirie Scott & Co. v. ParrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Berger v. HowlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Occidental Chemical Co. v. Agri Profit Systems, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Electrical Contractors Ass'n of City of Chicago, Inc. v. Illinois Building AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. TannahillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Collins Co. v. Carboline Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
- People Ex Rel. Resnik v. Curtis & Davis, Architects & Planners, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Marriage of OlsherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Rome v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Augsburg v. Frank's Car Wash, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.