Burroughs v. Holiday Inn
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION and ORDER
TELESCA, District Judge.
“In 42 U.S.C. § 1988, Congress quite clearly instructs federal courts to refer to state statutes when federal law provides no rule of decision for actions brought under Section 1983.” Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 484, 100 S.Ct. 1790, 1795, 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980) (internal quotations and brackets omitted). The question presented in this case is whether a federal action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is subject to the provisions of New York State law which require the service of a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- New York City Transit Authority v. BeazerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Burnett v. GrattanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hormel Foods Corporation v. Jim Henson Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Fuchilla v. LaymanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- 423 South Salina Street, Inc. v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Day v. MoscowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Day v. MoscowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.